Ideology and pragmatism can be at odds. Even something as fundamental as diversity and equity. Tune in to find out more
Buffett says that he always selects board members based on competence, relevant business experience, shareholder value, and special interest in Berkshire Hathaway.
His business partner Charlie Munger used to tell a story that explained the way they think about diversity:
As a lawyer, Munger did some work for the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles. His law partner at the time was surprised that a religious leader with strong convictions had chosen them for the task. He remarked, “We know you don't need to hire us to do this. There's plenty of good Catholic tax lawyers.”
The Archbishop’s response was thought-provoking. He said, “ Last year I had a very serious surgery and I did NOT look around for the leading Catholic surgeon.”
That's the way Buffett and Munger feel about diversity on the board.
Warren Buffett's views on diversity and inclusion might surprise you. Here is what he says
An analysis by Calvert Investment found that Coca-Cola (Warren Buffett is a big investor) was one of the best companies for workplace diversity while Berkshire Hathaway (Buffett’s own company) was one of the worst. Buffett has explicitly stated that he does not consider diversity when hiring for leadership roles and board members.
Confronting an authority and being confrontational are different things. The first is a measured question while the latter is a habit of creating a fuss at every provocation. Being perceived as confrontational generally backfires but if you confront intending to change unfair practices and systems, there is a chance things will go your way.
How to confront someone without being confrontational
We would like to invite you to a Salon where we will be discussing the important trends that will shape 2024.
Landemore’s case can be summarised in five key points -
Political deliberation can be understood as political problem-solving.
The Diversity Trumps Ability Theorem (DTA) suggests that, when certain conditions are met, maximizing cognitive diversity is more important for epistemically reliable problem-solving, than individual ability.
The conditions of the Diversity trumps ability theorem (DTA) can be satisfied in political deliberation.
Maximizing the number of individuals in political deliberation also maximizes cognitive diversity in political deliberation.
Democratic deliberation is more cognitively diverse than any form of non-democratic deliberation, on account of democratic deliberation being comparatively more inclusive of the entire population compared to non-democratic deliberation, even when the necessity of political representation is accounted for.
The Future of Democracy
In our previous newsletter we looked at 2024 and how this might be a year of democratic reckoning. With over 60 countries contesting elections, it’s set to be a political charged year. Maybe instead of criticising what is broken, we can reimagine what ought to be.
"The darker the night, the brighter the stars, The deeper the grief, the closer is God!"
"The darker the night, the brighter the stars, The deeper the grief, the closer is God!" | Fyodor Dostoevsky
Here is a podcast to rethink your career principles.